ABSTRACT
Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a standard of care for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate that eliminates myeloma cells by a multimodal mechanism: direct cell kill and anti-myeloma tumor immune response. Belamaf has demonstrated deep and durable responses as a monotherapy in the DREAMM-2 study of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Preclinical evidence of belamaf in combination with bortezomib or lenalidomide suggests enhanced anti-myeloma activity, providing rationale for this treatment combination. Aims: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination in adult pts with transplant-ineligible (TI) NDMM and establish the recommended Phase III dose. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open-label, randomized study of belamaf + VRd. The belamaf dose cohorts currently being evaluated are Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Belamaf is given with VRd Q3W until Cycle 8, and with Rd Q4W thereafter. After evaluation of safety data for Cohort 1, Cohorts 2-5 were opened in parallel and enrolled pts were randomized 1:1:1:1. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: As of data cutoff (07 Dec 2021), 64 pts were analyzed across all cohorts. Median age (range) was 73.0 (51- 88) years, 55% were male, 80% were white, 8% had extramedullary disease, 59% were International Staging System stage II or III, 20% had amp1q, and 17% had high-risk cytogenetics (≥1 of: t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p). The median duration of follow-up varied: Cohort 1 (17.4 months [mo]), Cohort 2 (5.9 mo), Cohort 3 (6.1 mo), Cohort 4 (4.7 mo), Cohort 5 (5.8 mo). Median number of belamaf cycles were: Cohort 1 (6), Cohort 2 (3), Cohort 3 (3.5), Cohort 4 (4.5), and Cohort 5 (5). Most common adverse events (AEs) across cohorts included thrombocytopenia (49%), constipation (43%), diarrhea (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%). AEs related to study treatment were experienced by 61 (97%) pts. Belamaf-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 24 (38%) pts. Belamaf dose reductions occurred in 11 (18%) pts, with dose delays in 10 (16%) pts. Three pts experienced a fatal severe AE (unrelated to study treatment);2 due to COVID-19 infection, 1 due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early deep responses were observed;67-92% pts achieved ≥very good partial response (VGPR) (Table), with median time to VGPR of 2.1-2.9 months across cohorts. Of pts with ≥VGPR, 17 were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative, 10 in Cohort 1. As of data cutoff, 8-75% of pts achieved best response of complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR). Grade 3 corneal exam findings were reported in 25-58% of pts;grade 3 visual acuity changes were reported in 21-75% of pts. No grade 4 corneal exam findings or visual acuity changes were reported in pts receiving belamaf Q6/8W, compared with 0-17% and 0-8%, respectively, in the Q3/4W cohorts. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that in pts with RRMM, accounting for baseline characteristics. Image: Summary/Conclusion: Belamaf + VRd demonstrated high response rates in pts with TI NDMM, with a high rate of MRD negativity indicating deep responses. No new safety signals were observed relative to DREAMM-2. Study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of variable dose intensities of belamaf in combination with VRd.
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus-2 has profound effects on patients (pts) with Multiple myeloma (MM). At the beginning of the pandemic, COVID-19 infection resulted an overall mortality around 54% (cook et al. BMJ 2020). Here, we report an updated morbidity and fatality for MM. Methods: After obtaining IRB approvals from each participating institute, retrospectively, between January 1, 2021 and August 30, 2021, we identified pts with MM and COVID-19 in two myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) & the University of Kansas medical center (KUMC). Results: We identified 162 MM pts who had COVID- 19 (LCI n=132, UKMC n=30), including 57% males, with median age of 64 years. Current or former smoking reported in 40% of pts. Most pts have associated comorbid conditions: hypertension (45%), hypogammaglobulinemia (32%), CKD (30%), DM (22%), obesity (16.6%), CHF (14%), and CAD (13.5%). Within 3 months prior to infection, treatment included immunomodulatory combinations in 35%, proteasome inhibitors in 28 %, and Daratumumab in 26.5%. Symptoms are summarized in table. 69% had Mild symptoms (no need for hospitalization), 20 % had moderate symptoms (requiring hospitalization), and 9.8% had severe symptoms (ICU level of care). The 18% of pts required oxygen: 6 pts required invasive oxygenation and 3 pts needed vasopressors. The 32% of pts had RRMM, 29.5% on maintenance, and 12% was getting induction. Regarding MM response: >VGPR in 45% and PD in 18%. The 78 pts had ASCT prior to COVID-19 infection: only 3 pts < 1 year and 3 pts < 6 months. MM response or ASCT did not affect hospitalization or mortality.The case fatality rate (CFR) was 6%. In the univariate analysis, CKD, DM, HTN and hepatic dysfunction were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. However, in multivariate analysis, only CKD, hepatic dysfunction, and Hypogammaglobulinemia significantly increased the risk of admission with only age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19 related fatatlity. Conclusions: With implementation of center-specific disease control measures and universal screening, pts might have lower case severity and fatality rate than was initially reported.
ABSTRACT
Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a SoC for NDMM. Belamaf, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Preclinical studies of belamaf in combination with bortezomib/ lenalidomide suggest enhanced antimyeloma activity. We report preliminary findings of belamaf + VRd for patients with TI NDMM. Materials and Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open label, randomized, dose and schedule evaluation trial. Adults with TI NDMM and ECOG status 0-2 are eligible. VRd is administered Q3W until Cycle 8, followed by lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd) Q4W. Belamaf + VRd is administered until Cycle 8, and with Rd thereafter. The currently evaluated belamaf dose cohorts are: Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/ kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: Overall 36 patients were treated across the 5 cohorts. The median (range) age was 74.0 (63-80) years;56% patients were male, 17 (47%) had stage 2 disease, 3 (8%) had extramedullary disease, 6 (17%) patients had high risk cytogenetic abnormalities;the median number of belamaf cycles ranged from 1-9. No new safety signals were observed. Across Cohorts 1-5, all patients experienced AEs related to study treatment;1 patient in Cohort 1 died due to COVID-19 infection. The most common AEs leading to dose modification were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and corneal events. Patients in Cohort 2 and 3 had the lowest number of Grade ≥3 corneal events (3 and 2 events, respectively). All 12 patients in Cohort 1, all 6 in Cohorts 3 and 5, and 5/6 patients in Cohorts 2 and 4 have responded to the treatment;≥half of patients in each cohort achieved very good partial response or better. As of data cut-off, 3/12 patients in Cohort 1, 2/6 in Cohort 4, and 1/6 patients each in Cohorts 3 and 5 remained in complete response. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that observed in patients with RRMM taking into consideration baseline patients characteristics. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest addition of belamaf to VRd did not reveal new safety signals and demonstrates high response rates, albeit with short follow-up. The trial is ongoing to confirm safety and evaluate the efficacy of belamaf + VRd. .
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite recent advances, MM remains incurable and new therapeutic options are needed, particularly for pts with RRMM. IBER is a novel, potent oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD ®) compound with enhanced tumoricidal and immune-stimulatory effects compared with immunomodulatory (IMiD ®) agents. Preclinically, IBER demonstrated marked synergy with DEX and with other standard myeloma treatments. CC-220-MM-001 (NCT02773030) is an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating IBER with different treatment combinations in independent cohorts of pts with RRMM;in phase 1, the recommended phase 2 dose of IBER, when given in combination with DEX, was determined at 1.6 mg (Lonial S, et al. Blood 2019;134[suppl 1]:3119). Here we report results from the dose expansion of IBER + DEX in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed (including ≥ 1 IMiD agent, ≥ 1 proteasome inhibitor [PI], and ≥ 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM;had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide (LEN), pomalidomide (POM), a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb;had experienced disease progression within 60 days of last myeloma therapy;and were refractory to an IMiD agent, a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb. Pts with central nervous system involvement were not eligible. Pts who had received prior anti-BCMA therapy were excluded, but included in a supportive cohort for safety and preliminary efficacy assessment. IBER (1.6 mg) was given orally on days (D) 1-21, in combination with DEX (40 mg;20 mg if > 75 years of age) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Thrombo-embolism prophylaxis was mandatory for all pts. Primary objective was to determine efficacy expressed as overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included additional efficacy and safety assessments. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: As of June 2, 2021, 107 pts had received IBER + DEX. Median age was 64 (44-83) years;median time since initial diagnosis was 6.9 (1.6-24.5) years. Extramedullary plasmacytomas were present in 25.2% of pts;29.9% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics. Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-23). All pts were triple-class exposed;prior therapies included autologous stem cell transplantation (78.5%), PIs (100%), IMiD agents (LEN [100%] and POM [100%]), and anti-CD38 mAbs (100%);99.1% of pts were refractory to last myeloma regimen and 97.2% of pts were triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.69 (0.5-17.5) months, with a median number of 4 (1-17) cycles received and 13 (12.1%) pts continuing treatment. Main reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (69.2%). ORR was 26.2%, with 1 (0.9%) stringent complete response, 8 (7.5%) very good partial responses, and 19 (17.8%) partial responses (Table);the clinical benefit rate (≥ minimal response) was 36.4% and disease control rate (≥ stable disease) was 79.4%. Median duration of response was 7.0 (4.5-11.3) months (Table), median progression-free survival was 3.0 (2.8-3.7) months, and median overall survival was 11.2 (9.0-not reached) months. Similar response rates were observed among a cohort of pts also exposed to BCMA therapies (N = 24, Table). Grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 88 (82.2%) pts. Most frequent (≥ 20% pts) hematologic Gr 3-4 TEAEs were neutropenia (44.9%;and 4.7% febrile neutropenia), anemia (28.0%), thrombocytopenia (21.5%), and leukopenia (20.6%). Gr 3-4 infections were reported in 27.1% of pts;Gr 3-4 pneumonia and COVID-19 occurred in 10.3% and 4.7% of pts, respectively. Occurrence of other Gr 3-4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low, including gastrointestinal disorders (5.6%), fatigue (2.8%), rash (1.9%). Fifty-six (52.3%) pts and 20 (18.7%) had IBER dose interruptions and reductions due to TEAEs, respectively. Five (4.7%) pts discontinued due to TEAEs. No pt discontinued IBER due to neutropenia. Overall, HRQoL was maintained in these pts. Conclusions: IBER + DEX demonst ated promising efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed and refractory RRMM, as well as in pts who had previously received anti-BCMA therapy;this combination was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable with dose reductions and interruptions. These results support the further development of IBER in MM, including phase 3 trials in combination regimens. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Lonial: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Merck: Honoraria;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Popat: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, and Celgene: Consultancy;Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES;AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen and BMS: Other: travel expenses. Hulin: Sanofi: Honoraria;Celgene/BMS: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;abbvie: Honoraria. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy;Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;Regeneron: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weisel: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy;Novartis: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria. Minnema: Cilag: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Alnylam: Consultancy;Celgene: Other: Travel expenses;Kite/Gilead: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy. Badros: J&J: Research Funding;Janssen: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Knop: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy;Oncopeptides: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultanc . Stadtmauer: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Nguyen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Amin: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Kueenburg: Celgene a BMS company: Current Employment. Peluso: Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. van de Donk: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Cellectis: Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy;Novartis /bayer/servier: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Background Patients (Pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) experience prolonged immunosuppression due to the incurable nature of the disease and corresponding treatment modalities. Due to this many MM pts with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) require hospitalization, with an increased mortality rate over healthy adults. Two mRNA vaccines against (SARS-CoV-2): BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273 were approved under an emergency use authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to the high efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to analyze the antibody (Abs) response in all pts with plasma cell disorders (PCD) including MM, AL-Amyloidosis, and smoldering myeloma (SMM) who are on active treatment. Patients & Methods All pts (MM, AL-Amyloidosis, and SMM) on active treatment who received SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine were identified at the University of Kansas Health System between January 2021 to July 2021and reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive analyses were performed on available data for patient characteristics. Abs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using methodology approved by the FDA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Detection Kit;GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). We stratified pts into clinically relevant responders (>250 IU/mL), partial responders (50-250 IU/mL), and non-responders (<50 IU/mL) Results A total of 118 pts were identified in our analysis and are described in Table 1. Of the total pts, 102 (86%) had MM, 13 (11%) pts had AL-Amyloidosis, and 3 (3%) pts had SMM. Median age was 69 years (45-95), 96 pts (81%) were Caucasian, and 57 (48%) were male. Median lines of prior treatment was 2 (1-13). Active PCD patients were treated with single-agent therapy in 60 pts (51%), doublet-based therapy in 5 pts (4%), and triplet-based therapy in 51 pts (43%). Daratumumab based therapy was utilized in 59 pts (50%). All pts included received two doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. At the time of abs testing 82 patients (69%) were in a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, 29 pts (25%) were in partial response, while 7 pts (6%) had stable disease. Five pts (4%) had COVID-19 infection prior to the vaccine. The median time between thesecond dose of the vaccine and testing for Abs was 100 days (34-190). Only 46 pts (39%) developed an adequate response, 36 pts (30.5%) had a partial response, while 36 (30.5%) did not respond to the vaccine. Low Ab levels were seen in all PCD subtypes with the following mean levels: SMM :25.4 (5.4- 36.9) IU/mL, MM 148 (0- >250) IU/mL, and AL- Amyloidosis 92.35 (range 0- >250) IU/mL. Among the 5 pts with COVID-19 infection prior to the vaccination, full Abs response was observed in 4 pts, and 1 patient had no Abs response. Type of treatment did not affect the response to treatment in any clinically meaningful way. The odds ratio of achieving a clinically relevant Abs response was higher in pts with absolute lymphocyte counts>0.5 K/uL (p=0.01) and IgG levels> 400 mg/dL (p=0.04) and lower in pts receiving treatments with daratumumab combinations or anti-BCMA therapy (p<0.0001). Higher levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Abs were observed in pts with ≥ VGPR (mean≈147 IU/mL) compared to <VGPR (mean≈ 119 IU/mL). However, in this dataset, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.17). Conclusion mRNA vaccine Ab response is lower in PCD pts getting active treatment compared with the general population. For PCD patients on active treatment, mRNA vaccine produced full antibody responses and partial responses in 39% and 30.5% of pts, respectively. anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs are especially low for patients on daratumumab combinations or anti-BCMA therapy, low lymphocytes, and low IgG levels at the time of vaccination. Some PCD may not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs despite vaccination and/or previous COVID-19 infection. Therefore, checking anti-SARS-CoV-2 abs may be clinically useful in identifying patient's response. Further prospective studies should ascertain the value of a 3 rd vaccine dose in this population. [Fo mula presented] Disclosures: Mahmoudjafari: Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McGuirk: Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding;Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy;Gamida Cell: Research Funding;Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding;Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding;Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Research Funding. Atrash: Jansen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;AMGEN: Research Funding;GSK: Research Funding.